Surprise, surprise. Evidence is showing the sun is affecting radioactive decay rates, long thought to be immutable constants. If decay rates can vary, then the foundation for all ancient dating methods is bogus. Along with other, mounting evidence against an old earth, this suggests young-earthers may be right*. » read more »

This is a simply riveting paper linking the observed quantization of cosmological redshift with Zero Point Energy (ZPE). The implications are tremendous. » read more »

Obozo calls us Bitter Clingers, but the really bitter clingers are those adhering to the idiotic, incomplete, unsubstantiated, and disproved dynamo hypothesis of Earth's magnetic field. For many decades, pagan* "scientists" have clung to the hypothesis that the Earth's magnetic field is created by a self-perpetuating dynamo effect in the planet's core. They seem to ignore the idiocy of the "self-perpetuating" part because it's crucial to maintain the illusion of billions of years of the field's existence. » read more »

At the extreme ends of physics, General Relativity predicts its downfall (e.g., inside the event horizon of black holes). In similar fashion, Naturalism dooms itself, but it does so not at the extreme ends but even before it gets going and at every step along the way. » read more »

The U.S. National Academy of Sciences defines "theory" as:

A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.

Does Evolution meet this criteria for being a theory? » read more »

When you use the wrong worldview, you can end up with all kinds of bizarre effects. When these effects are destructive to the worldview itself, they are indications of internal inconsistencies, suggesting (or screaming) the worldview's lack of viability. The planet that cannot be is yet another case in point. » read more »

Naturalists, those whose faith is based upon amoral chance and only what they can sense, certainly utter many idiocies. It's a predictable effect of highly errant worldviews. We can see several examples in this so-called logic.

Let's say the point of punctuated equilibrium is that a dynamically selective environment is extremely rare. By dynamically selective I mean consistent gentle pressure to develop a trait. » read more »

When Naturalists preach their Darwinian nonsense, an effective retort (were it not for Naturalists' profound stupidity) would be:

"How odd it is that anyone should not see that all observation must be for or against some view if it is to be of any service!"

In other words, the assumed worldview provides the interpretation of facts. If the worldview is wrong, the interpretation like is, too. » read more »

Naturalists deny any possibility of a global flood here on Earth, yet they've begun talking about the very same on Mars. In fact, they believe there are great glaciers of frozen water underneath the surfaces of Mars, Titan (moon of Saturn), Ganymede, Callisto, and Europa (these last three are moons of Jupiter). For Mars in particular, Naturalists are now suggesting its global flood may have happened "when large amounts of groundwater burst on to the surface" of the planet, a la "fountains of the deep" (Proverbs 8:28). » read more »

For 150 years, idiots have been looking for the mythological planet Vulcan. No, it's not the one from Star Trek, although they did take the name from this myth. 150 years ago, astronomers began looking for a hypothetical planet with an orbit between Mercury and the sun. They theorized its existence because Mercury's orbit was not behaving as the models were predicting. They predicted an elliptical orbit, and they saw one, but they also observed this ellipse slowly rotating (the foci were not stationary as the models predicted). They concluded there must be another planet, a fairly large one, that was pulling Mercury's orbit around. » read more »