TLDs

What do you think about Top Level Domains? We're all familiar with some of the originals: .com, .net, .org, .edu, .gov, .mil, etc. Now there are all kinds of new ones: .tv, .name, .biz, .info, .mobi, etc. The Internet evolved from several different networks. For example, universities had their own for data sharing (now .edu); the military had their own (now .mil); and on and on. Nowadays, though, what value does the TLD really add to a website's name? The branding is in the second level domain name. TuscanyCircle.net, TuscanyCircle.com, and TuscanyCircle.org all point to TuscanyCircle (duh), and the TLD really doesn't add much value. Comcast.com points to Comcast's overall business, while comcast.net is used for their ISP portion; this distinction can easily be lost on those trying to email someone with a comcast address. And what if I wanted to snag comcast.biz? Pragmatically, how are comcast.com and comcast.biz different? The first connotes a commercial enterprise and the second a business. Whoa. Big difference. </sarcasm>

I can see government and military networks being separate or separable; but I don't see any point to having multiple TLDs for the private sector. Take the .mobi TLD as an example. It's supposed to stand for "mobile". (I think several other alternatives would have been better than "mobi", but that's merely an aesthetic judgment.) There are several ways of detecting mobile browsers, though, so a separate domain just isn't necessary. TuscanyCircle detects mobile browsers, by the way; when detected, it changes the search block to one that works on mobile devices (the standard one is a tad too sophisticated for PIE). Google has done this for a while. I can use all kinds of Google tools on my WM5 PDA without remembering mobile-specific URLs. Google detects the mobile browser and presents different pages, better suited for mobile browsing. No new TLD is necessary, or frankly, even desired. Some domain names are even hard to remember without adding a bunch of TLDs to sift through.

Something like TuscanyCircle does not seem to have an obviously implied TLD. I originally picked .net because it was my presence on the Internet and didn't fit any other TLDs at the time (last millennium). I've since added .com and .org, largely because it's not obvious which would apply and because these three tend to be the most common, popularly speaking. (I would add .edu as a way of thumbing my nose at the "academic" establishment--the joke that it largely is--but it's been locked down in an elitist attempt to protect their fragile egos--er, pseudo-intellectual home-away-from-reality--no, I mean industry, yeah, bilking industry.)

Educate me. Enlighten me. Show me the value of TLDs that I may be missing. What do you think about them?

Trackback URL for this post:

http://tuscanycircle.net/trackback/850

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Less is More

This phrase seems to fit well here... "Less is more." I think the more TLDs that are created, that more confusion could ensue.

We already have internet scum out there who deliberately create URLs, just so they can divert kids (or whoever) to their scummy porno websites just by typing in a misspelled URL. Creating even more TLDs opens many doors to many more of these websites, creating more of a danger to the innocent.

On the converse side, I do like the .tv TLD as is signifies a certain TV enterprise, and wouldn't be opposed to that. And maybe .movi for movies. But other than that, I can't really think of any need for any more TLDs.

.tv, .mobi, .scum

You know that .tv isn't really a television TLD? It's the TLD for the great nation of Tuvalu. Of course, it's used by television, because it's an obvious reference--more obvious than Tuvalu, IMO.

Tell me this: what's up with the bizarre abbreviations? Why .movi instead of .movie? Why not one more character? If you're gonna stick with a short TLD, assume the original convention of three letters and use .mov in this case. Then there's my favorite, .mobi. Maybe this makes more sense in foreign languages, but it looks stupid in English. Again, .mob maybe, or why not .mobile? Of course, my original argument is best: just detect the browser and select pages accordingly--no need for another TLD at all.

Kidding aside, good point about the 'net scum. I don't care for the domain name misdirection and other tricks they tend to play to draw you to their sites. I'm inclined to let the scum stay, though, and let that subculture darn itself to hell, if that's where they intend on going. Without the freedom to sin, there is no freedom to be righteous. Having said that, there's not really any redeeming value to internet porn, so I don't see any justification for obedient disciples to be heading that way.