4th is dead

| | |

A homeschooling mother encounters government agents (a "dog warden" and a police officer) who have no clue what the Fourth Amendment is:

A dog warden showed up at the Jones (name changed to protect privacy) family home in Northern Ohio after receiving a tip from neighbor. She demanded entry into the family’s home, because she wanted to “see if their dog was healthy.”

Mrs. Jones, a homeschooling mother of 10, responded respectfully to this surprise intrusion by politely informing the dog warden that she had a Fourth Amendment right under the Constitution protecting her from warrantless searches and seizures. Mrs. Jones politely explained that her dog was healthy and that unless the dog warden had a search warrant, she would not allow her to come into the house or see the dog.

The dog warden became annoyed and threatened to call the police if Mrs. Jones did not allow her to see the dog. Mrs. Jones politely stood her ground, calmly stating that she would explain her right to the police officer if necessary. The dog warden spitefully called the police. When an officer arrived and asked the mother why she was giving the warden a hard time, Mrs. Jones simply explained she was unwilling to give up her Fourth Amendment right. As she explained this to the police officer, the dog warden rudely interrupted, “What is the Fourth Amendment?” Incredibly, as Mrs. Jones continued, the police officer stated that “The Fourth Amendment has nothing to do with searches and seizures.” [Emphasis added]

Trackback URL for this post:

http://tuscanycircle.net/trackback/1340

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Police IQ

The average policeman's IQ is only 104. An IQ of 125 is deemed "too smart" for police work!

Sadly, 104 is a step up!

The oldest known usage of psychology in policing was for mental testing, which was soon followed by personality testing (Bartol & Bartol 2004). During the early 20th Century, several prominent psychologists tested the intelligence of police officers. For example, the well-known psychologist Louis Terman in 1917 found that the average IQ of some California officers was only 80 (-1σ), and for many years, 80 was the IQ cutoff for being able to be hired in a public safety job. The psychologist Louis Thurstone in 1922 found some Michigan officers with an average IQ of 71 (-1.5σ), and other studies found officers with IQs as low as 55 (-2.3σ).

The scale used in this latter article appears to have a standard deviation of about 20. Therefore, I've inserted what I believe to be the approximate SDs next to the numbers (ref.).

Principled Police?

According to Zietsman's description of IQs and morality, policemen would have to have IQs of at least +2σ (more likely +2.5σ or +3σ) in order to have any hope of questioning the status quo should the status quo violate Constitutional principles. Given this just about exceeds the upper limit of IQs for acceptable candidates, you can be sure police forces are composed entirely of those willing to violate the law just to keep their jobs. I'm sure this is no coincidence.

By the way, 105 (0.3σ) is about the average for U.S. military enlistees, so the same problem exists there. Officers appear to be in the +1σ range.

Considering these two groups, police and military, make up the bulk of the forces that would--nay, will--be used against American citizens (should they assert their rights again one day), there's not much hope of success in any open rebellion. Guerrilla is really the only option, then.

Failing Fourth

Don't keep us hanging, how did it turn out?

Link included

Thanks for the ping. Link included now.